Job applicant declines an AI-only first interview on principle, viewing it as a cultural red flag, despite the company offering him a human alternative after his refusal: 'I'm not interested in continuing with a process that relies on AI'

Advertisement
  • Artificial intelligence communication
  • I just told a recruiter I won't do an AI interview with them

    I'm currently working in a stable place. The salary is good and the work is fine, but I've started to get a bit bored and need a new challenge.
  • So I've been casually applying to a few jobs that look interesting to me. And since I'm not in a hurry to leave my current job, I have the luxury of being selective.
  • I got a response from one of the places I applied to. A recruiter sent me an email saying the first stage would be an automated Al interview, and sent the link and all the details.
  • I replied and politely declined. I told him thank you for the opportunity, but I'm not interested in continuing with a process that relies on Al.
  • I kept it professional and brief. A day or two later, I found a voicemail from someone else on their HR team, who seemed to be senior.
  • She said they saw my email and offered to do a regular call with a real person.
  • For a moment, I thought, 'Great, they're flexible.' And I was about to call her back.
  • But the more I thought about it, the more it felt wrong. It's not about avoiding the robot interview itself, it's a matter of principle.
  • Robot/Artificial intelligence deciding on job applicants
  • If a company's first step is to outsource a simple human interaction like this to an algorithm, it says a lot about their culture.
  • To me, that's a red flag. Do I think my email is going to change the company's policy?
  • Of course not. I'm sure there are 50 other candidates right behind me who did the interview with the machine without a second thought.
  • But I felt it was the right thing to do to register my small protest against this absurdity that kills any human connection.
  • Honestly, the truth is that the luxury of choice, of looking for a job while you are secure and have nothing to stress you out from the tension of ridiculous interviews, is the peak of greatness.
  • AcrobaticKey4183 I refuse them as well.
  • In-person work interview
  • OldGuard4114 I won't do it and I'm not helping train that bullshit. HR the useless bunch that they are can do their job and do interviews. If they take too much time then stop asking stupid questions and get to the point instead of psychoanalyzing a perfect company fit.
  • Longjumping_Duty4160 OP, that is the correct answer.
  • HermanCainShow I've always declined automated Al type of interviews. They're impersonal, cold and, most importantly, useless. A software will never be able to detect and analyse your soft skills, nor your deep understanding of the workplace's dynamics. It's just a lazy, cost cutting way to assess people and that tells you all you need to know about a company's real culture. Profit first, people somewhere near to the bottom. Respectfully, fuck working somewhere with that set of values.
  • Oklron6206 Is this a "One Way Virtual Video" I have one tomorrow. Thanks in advance.
  • Icy-Stock-5838 I did an uploaded video interview for a small mom & pop company.. It was weird, and the in-person interview also included take- home work once I made it to final round.. Anyway I got the job.. The place had such unique culture, and it was contagious, magnetic, and MEANINGFUL.. This company taught me so much about how good a workplace can be with good culture, and how it imputes itself in the quality of work people do.. Their HR and Talent department was only 2 people, was 1 when I
  • Beautiful-Hat1090 Nowadays, Al interviews are the norm. Most staffing/recruiting agencies use it to "screen" candidates even though it ain't the best criteria to guage a candidate's competency for a role.

Tags

Scroll Down For The Next Article